[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)

Am 10.11.2010 13:49, schrieb Marco Hogewoning:
>>> I am missing your point here. These might be a lot of garbage
>>> data. What is wrong about have ONE consistent way to publish
>>> abuse contacts? Don't you find this "A Good Thing"?
>> 
>> And how anybody could stop publishing this kind of info in remark 
>> fields?
> 
> 
> Yups, +1...we can discard the abuse-mailbox field but not the
> remarks. That's why I suggested to get the statistics done again.
> Most likely the majority of the objects are still covered with a
> remarks line and at least that is better than nothing.

Don't get me wrong. I do not want to delete data before there is a IRT.
Since the IRT will be mandatory, RIPE is able to push things faster.
Contact people, ask them to update, ...

This will take some time. And there is no reason to say, that we will
delete the existing abuse-mailbox attributes not before an IRT is setup.
There is no reason not to change "end of 2012" into "end of 2013"

The point is, that this discussion is going on for more than 7 years now
and there is still no sufficient solution.

Thanks,

Tobias

abusix.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101110/73c31567/attachment.sig>