This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Nov 10 13:49:12 CET 2010
>> I am missing your point here. These might be a lot of garbage data. What is >> wrong about have ONE consistent way to publish abuse contacts? Don't you find >> this "A Good Thing"? > > And how anybody could stop publishing this kind of info in remark > fields? Yups, +1...we can discard the abuse-mailbox field but not the remarks. That's why I suggested to get the statistics done again. Most likely the majority of the objects are still covered with a remarks line and at least that is better than nothing. Groet, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]