This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tobias Knecht
tk at abusix.com
Wed Nov 10 12:33:49 CET 2010
> Greylisting doesn't cause any real issues unless your setup is badly broken > If you're trying to make a point then it's not working ... It does. Believe me. ISP-A is greylisting mails from ISP-B and those mails will be deferred by only 10 minutes. Over a while customers of ISP-B will wonder why mails take more than 10 minutes to be delivered and postmaster will wonder why his Qs are getting bigger and bigger. It is not hurting that much, but if you can fix it by creating an IRT, you will probably do. Thanks, Tobias abusix.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101110/fd383e95/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]