This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Olivier Beckers/ZB00036/EniCoordinationCenter-BE/ENI/IT is out of the office.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Cox
richard.cox at btuser.net
Tue Aug 10 21:38:00 CEST 2010
Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: > Maybe we should make a rehersal, vote or proposal to answer a simply > question: "should RIPE create regulations to remove resources because > of abuse ?" The RIPE Policy Development Process is at your disposal. The AAWG is just as entitled to propose and agree a policy as any of the other RIPE WGs. You seem to have a lot of sympathetic ears here, so over to you. In the interests of Full Disclosure, I should mention that I will be submitting some of my own proposals very shortly (I referred to them briefly in Prague); they include providing registration- / changed-dates for IP and ASN allocations in all WHOIS responses (ie without requiring the -b switch) and also providing information in the standard WHOIS data on which LIR (if any) was involved in allocating a specific resource -- Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Olivier Beckers/ZB00036/EniCoordinationCenter-BE/ENI/IT is out of the office.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]