This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
andre at ox.co.za
andre at ox.co.za
Tue Aug 10 07:40:12 CEST 2010
Frank Gadegast said on Monday 09 August 2010 : > Thor Kottelin wrote: > >> removing networks from RIPEs databased > >> will also remove all reverse mapping and nameserver entries, right > >> ? > >> > >> No mailserver, that is configured to fight only a bit against spam > >> accepts mail from IPs without a working reverse mapping. > >> > >> So, if RIPE ever wants to punish network abusers, thats an easy way > >> of > >> doing it ... > > > > I agree that this may be a somewhat effective approach. > > > > All this is technically easy, the only thing missing is a discussion, > who decides, what objects need to be remove and why. > This is the best idea that I have heard in a long time and there could be proper structures in place (similiar to spamcop) to prevent abuse Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]