This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
AW: [anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
- Next message (by thread): AW: [anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Thu Mar 12 16:37:51 CET 2009
On 12/03/2009 1:15, "Frank Gadegast" <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: [...] > Users are usually uninformed about their possibilities and only > complain a lot. Spam is not being recognized by the masses as > being a crime so far. And based on what I see, they tend to send abuse reports to the wrong place because they don't now how to read e-mail headers and the on-line tools they use often don't read them correctly either. I don't think end users should have to know how to read e-mail headers but I know that they often try to in an attempt to reduce the amount of spam they receive and then get very confused and frustrated when they get a note back telling them they sent the complaint to the wrong place. Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
- Next message (by thread): AW: [anti-abuse-wg] how to detect spambots - SPAMTrusted
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]