This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Mon Jun 12 15:07:21 CEST 2023
Hi Sander, I'm not very familiar with the history but if it is like you are describing it then I agree with you. Although we should maybe split this into a different thread because this is getting a bit confusing. -Cynthia On Mon, 12 Jun 2023, 14:13 Sander Steffann, <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > Hi WG, > > At some point in the past we had a discussion about making it easier to > request ASNs, basically removing the multihoming requirement. This working > group at the time decided to not do this because it *might* cause someone > to ask for an insane number of ASNs and overload the RIPE NCC. A recurring > (or even a one-time) cost for ASNs would automatically solve this issue, > because going insane would become financially unfeasible :) > > Now that the RIPE NCC’s membership has decided that they don’t care about > this, I think it’s time to reopen this discussion on our side. There are > many reasons someone might want to have an (extra) ASN: lab use, education > (I’d love to set up BGP training course where students can actually > announce a real IPv6 prefix to the world with a real ASN and see the > results), internal use (while still needing a globally unique one), not YET > being multi homed but going to in the future etc. > > I’d like to propose to remove the multi homing requirement from our ASN > policy, as the main reason why we decided not to last time doesn’t seem to > hold anymore. > > Cheers, > Sander > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20230612/0854bf64/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Input Requested: How to Ensure Responsible ASN Resource Management
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]