This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Address Policy WG Agenda - RIPE 85
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Kayser
Kurt.Kayser at online.de
Wed Oct 12 16:20:24 CEST 2022
Hi, I am in favor for this suggestion as well. >> Marco Schmidt wrote on 11/10/2022 11:49: >>> One possible solution would be to review the current policy and propose a policy change, for example the introduction of a minimum IPv4 assignment size. >>> Does the working group agree that this is an issue that should be discussed and that might require a policy change? >> seems reasonable. > +1 > Sander > +1 Kurt
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Address Policy WG Agenda - RIPE 85
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]