This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Oct 12 15:42:24 CEST 2022
Hi, > On 12 Oct 2022, at 12:36, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > > Marco Schmidt wrote on 11/10/2022 11:49: >> One possible solution would be to review the current policy and propose a policy change, for example the introduction of a minimum IPv4 assignment size. >> Does the working group agree that this is an issue that should be discussed and that might require a policy change? > > seems reasonable. +1 Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Potential Improvements to the Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]