[address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments

Actually you want RFC 8950.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8950


On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 07:55 Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:

> Will Hargrave wrote on 08/11/2022 13:48:
> > If we think router vendors are in a position to reliably support v4
> > AF over BGP in v6, and actually route this traffic
> this is kinda the problem with RFC 5549, no?  I.e. it deals only with
> signaling rather than transport. So even if it's deployed, the IXP will
> still need to provide ipv4 addresses for transport purposes.
>
> Nick
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change
> your subscription options, please visit:
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>
-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20221108/26295112/attachment.html>