[address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies

> I *do* like the suggestion Daniel Karrenberg made how to tackle this -
> give the NCC more liberty how to handle "experiments" by consulting,
> if needed, with an expert panel.  I do see the issue in defining
> "expert", but maybe this could be made sufficiently lightweight - "ask
> for a volunteer group of individuals that have had hands-on experience
> with BGP routing for <n> years" (because, I think, that's really the
> crucial part here, to differenciate from other setups that can do the
> 50% just fine, or use RFC1918 space instead).

you are a (new) LIR applying for IP space.  you submit an addressing
plan.  the ncc convenes a volunteer panel of your competitors to
evaluate that plan.  oops!

tragically, research is competitive, and the ideas are the protein.

[ fyi, i admit to being just a shill here.  it was reg services who
  asked for help on the issue. ]

randy