[address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies

Hi Gert,

That is what we have, the current "Temporary Internet Number Assignment
> Policy", ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-526 - it does that, but as
> Randy noticed, it has clauses in there that are hard to fulfill for
> routing experiments ("50% usage" in 3.3).
>

+1, any research in the control plane is certainly hampered by this
restriction, and I don't see any benefit here for anyone


>
> I *do* like the suggestion Daniel Karrenberg made how to tackle this -
> give the NCC more liberty how to handle "experiments" by consulting, if
> needed, with an expert panel.  I do see the issue in defining "expert",
> but maybe this could be made sufficiently lightweight - "ask for a
> volunteer group of individuals that have had hands-on experience with
> BGP routing for <n> years" (because, I think, that's really the crucial
> part here, to differenciate from other setups that can do the 50% just
> fine, or use RFC1918 space instead).
>

+1 as well


> I'd volunteer, I'm good at not-liking things :-)
>

I would be a volunteer as well (on my spare time, I'm not sure I could
convince my employer of the benefits to its activities)
In my case, n>12 :-)


> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>

Not yet, but the day is still young.

Stéphane Dodeller
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20220203/a57c4932/attachment.html>