This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Oct 28 14:51:27 CET 2020
> On 28 Oct 2020, at 12:39, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > What I don't think is right is that we bypass the justified need. The notion of justified need makes no sense for IPv6. An ISP might give my mum a /64 or a /80. There’s no way she can demonstrate a *need* for so much address space. It’s at least a billion times more space than she could credibly use. Please stop trying to impose now dead IPv4 mindsets on IPv6.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]