This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] WG: Question regarding RIPE-738 IPv6-Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG: Question regarding RIPE-738 IPv6-Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt.Kayser at bmi.bund.de
Kurt.Kayser at bmi.bund.de
Fri Jul 24 10:37:31 CEST 2020
Hello Gert, thanks for clarification. The main sentence that confused me was this in Appendix A: " It is an address allocation utilisation ratio and not an address assignment utilisation ratio." What you now explain still defines a classical "assignment utilization rate" with a limted look up to a /56 granularity. I assume the misinterpretation is the second part which does not require "full subnets", hence again the term "allocation". So there are 3 parts to correctly calculate HD-ratios: 1. IP-Allocation from RIR to LIRs 2. Assignments for true use from LIR to endsites/users/devices - to be counted as /56 or /48 units (as shown as "used" in the LIR portal) 3. All networks below /56 that are assigned are not to be evaluated deeper about efficient usage. Correct? Best regards On behalf Kurt Kayser _______________________ Kurt Kayser Konsultation im Auftrag des Referates SK 4 - Konzeption/ Local Internet Registry Bundesanstalt für den Digitalfunk der Behörden und Organisationen mit Sicherheitsaufgaben (BDBOS) Telefon: +49 (0) 1575-2634020 E-Mail: Kurt.Kayser at bmi.bund.de Internet: www.bdbos.bund.de -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gert Doering <gert at space.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2020 16:53 An: Kayser (Extern), Kurt <Kurt.Kayser at bmi.bund.de> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] WG: Question regarding RIPE-738 IPv6-Policy Hi Kurt, On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:40:38PM +0000, Kurt.Kayser at bmi.bund.de wrote: > What is the correct way to calculcate the utilization? Count /56s assigned. /48s count as 256x /56. Look up /56 count in the HD ratio table. The confusing sentence is supposed to convey "we care about efficiency of usage inside the 'allocation' arena", so "/56 or /48 inside the /32 or larger". We do not care about efficiency in the "assigned chunk", so in the /56 we do not care if 1 address was used or 100. (Which is different from IPv4, so it ended up in this - very old - text) Less confusing now? Or did I make it worse? Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG: Question regarding RIPE-738 IPv6-Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]