[address-policy-wg] WG: Question regarding RIPE-738 IPv6-Policy

Hi Kurt,

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:40:38PM +0000, Kurt.Kayser at bmi.bund.de wrote:
> What is the correct way to calculcate the utilization?

Count /56s assigned.  /48s count as 256x /56.  Look up /56 count in the
HD ratio table.

The confusing sentence is supposed to convey "we care about efficiency
of usage inside the 'allocation' arena", so "/56 or /48 inside the /32
or larger".  We do not care about efficiency in the "assigned chunk",
so in the /56 we do not care if 1 address was used or 100.

(Which is different from IPv4, so it ended up in this - very old - text)

Less confusing now?  Or did I make it worse?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20200723/ab545051/attachment.sig>