[address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?

On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 17:56, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <
address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote:

> What I’m saying is that we force the change of status from non-legacy to
> legacy if addresses are transferred to a new member or an existing member,
> as both of them will have all the legal bindings already with RIPE NCC.
>

If the goal is to have a correct and updated registry adding criteria by
force to transfers is counter productive.

For larger address space transactions this will simply lead to transfer of
legal entities, or other legal constructs to circumvent the policies.

I belive the community should focus strongly on an accurate registry as the
main principle.

Hans Petter

-- 
-- Hans Petter Holen Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net |
http://hph.oslo.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190721/1bc73bf1/attachment.html>