[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

Hi,

/Rationale://
//[...]//
//By extending the availability of IPv4 addresses to newcomers, the RIPE 
community demonstrates goodwill towards competition laws and 
regulations. It is recognised that even with the ongoing implementation 
of IPv6 the global internet is going to need some IPv4 resources for 
another decade or two./
/[...]/

Maybe I'm missing something here. Is it fair that a LIR with multiple 
/12 pays the same fee of a LIR with a single /22? Is this how RIPE 
NCC/"//demonstrates goodwill towards competition laws and regulations." /?

I oppose this proposal, unless at least RIPE NCC will charge members 
based on how much IPv4 space they have. I find that this will be the 
only way to really boost IPv6 adoption.

Regards

-- 
Saverio Giuntini
Servereasy Srl

Il 04/02/2019 13:04, Marco Schmidt ha scritto:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-02, "Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24"
> is now available for discussion.
>
> This proposal aims to reduce the IPv4 allocation size to a /24 once the
> RIPE NCC is unable to allocate contiguous /22 ranges.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-02
>
> As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this
> four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide
> feedback to the proposer.
>
> At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of
> the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal.
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 5 March 2019.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Officer
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190207/c0a501ab/attachment.html>