[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

>
> and then you were presented with the simple flag, "250 GB sufficient:
> yes/no"
>
> What would you choose?
>
> My bet is that you would choose "no" and request 1 TB.
> -- 

Slight difference: we're talking about a scarce resource here, which -
depending on your choice - might or might not be available. So the
choice is rather:

1) packs of 250GB, 500GB or 1TB up to a total of 1TB (packs might not be
available at the same time)
2) 1TB in on pack of 1TB

Though, thinking about the billing, RIPE has to (or should) define how
to do the billing based on the number of resources ... currently,
billing is per resource, not sure if this will be kept if due to
availability issues this would remain (in essence, increasing the price
for LIRs that have to take multiple /24 instead of one /22) or whether
they would still receive their initial fragmented /22 amount of IPs
included as "first resource" ...

-garry

--

Garry Glendown * Professional Services & Solutions

NETHINKS GmbH | Bahnhofstraße 16 | 36037 Fulda T +49 661 25 000 0 | F +49 661 25 000 49 | garry.glendown at nethinks.com
Geschäftsführer: Uwe Bergmann, Bastian Marmetschke Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Garry Glendown | AG Fulda HRB 2546

PGP Fingerprint: B1CF 4952 F6EB E060 8A10 B957 700E F97F B412 DD32

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190206/4ebb3cec/attachment.html>