[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:10 PM Kai 'wusel' Siering <wusel+ml at uu.org> wrote:

> On 06.02.2019 12:32, Denis Fondras wrote:
>
> If you keep there /22 and /24 as an option, than there would be no problem.
>
> No please, don't let LIR choose. This will only complicate management of
> resources.
>
>
> It's a simple flag, "/24 sufficienct: yes/no".
>

The flag is simple, and most people will then select "no", because they
want to ensure that they get the most.

Imagine if you were a Dropbox customer, and Dropbox offered two paid
storage plans for $200/mo:

1) 250 GB
2) 1 TB

and then you were presented with the simple flag, "250 GB sufficient:
yes/no"

What would you choose?

My bet is that you would choose "no" and request 1 TB.
-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190206/a83adb4b/attachment.html>