[address-policy-wg] What we want to be acceptable in IPv4 PI and IPv6 PI?

>We should stop caring about IPv4 PI, as that is long gone.

And about IPv4 PA and stop to help RIPE to earn money. :)

ср, 17 окт. 2018 г., 16:12 Gert Doering <gert at space.net>:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:08:49PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via
> address-policy-wg wrote:
> > Trying to look into my presentation today from a higher-level
> perspective ...
> >
> > What is the expected usage of IPv4 and IPv6 PI?
>
> We should stop caring about IPv4 PI, as that is long gone.
>
> So the focus needs to be "what is an IPv6 PI policy that is useful for
> the RIPE region".
>
> Wether or not this is the same as what we had for IPv4 in the past is
> only of historic relevance.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael
> Emmer
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20181017/f0736a4f/attachment.html>