[address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: proposal to remove IPv6 PI

Hi,

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 08:54:40PM +0100, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 05:12:45PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> >Especially in the government and enterprise market, there's other models
> >today, like "the government LIR holds a /26, each region in a country
> >has a /32 out of that, and each region is free to pick their own ISP
> >to have the /32 routed".
> 
> Right. So all that is needed to dispose of PIv6 is to make these
> /32s portable and perhaps a change in additional allocation
> calculations in order to let the LIR get more resources if the
> existing (sub-allocated) resources are not sufficiently utilized.

This is not *exactly* the same as a "/48".

Just sayin'

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20180521/49716c64/attachment.sig>