[address-policy-wg] [Ext] Re: proposal to remove IPv6 PI

Hi Gert,

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 05:12:45PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>Especially in the government and enterprise market, there's other models
>today, like "the government LIR holds a /26, each region in a country
>has a /32 out of that, and each region is free to pick their own ISP
>to have the /32 routed".

Right. So all that is needed to dispose of PIv6 is to make these
/32s portable and perhaps a change in additional allocation
calculations in order to let the LIR get more resources if the
existing (sub-allocated) resources are not sufficiently utilized.

rgds,
Sascha Luck

>
>(The impact to the routing table is is about the same as "each region
>has their own LIR", but for internal administrative reasons these setups
>prefer to have a common address space for all official networks...)
>
>Gert Doering
>        -- APWG chair
>-- 
>have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
>SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
>Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
>D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
>Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279