This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kai 'wusel' Siering
wusel+ml at uu.org
Sun May 20 23:22:43 CEST 2018
Am 20.05.2018 um 11:57 schrieb JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg: > Once more ... this is not the point. I mention it as one possible choice (change fees or not, change contract or not). I looks like there's not much positive feedback to your »proposal«: I suggest to bury it ... > However, we can change the policy so that both PA and PI are "allocations" and there is no artificial differences in between and consequently, restrictions which are difficult to define "border lines". To me it seems there's not much interesst in changing this, especially as that would pave the way to a usage pattern that seems to be rather unwanted in the community (ISPing off End User address space). Regards, -kai
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]