[address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI

Hi Kai, below.

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Kai 'wusel' Siering <wusel+ml at uu.org>
Organización: Unseen University, Department of Magic Mails
Fecha: sábado, 19 de mayo de 2018, 18:11
Para: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI

    Am 19.05.2018 um 12:07 schrieb JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg:
    > My proposal is NOT to stop IPv6 PI,
    
    Alternative facts? The title says "to remove IPv6 PI".

[Jordi] You're taking the tittle literally. If this is a problem I will find a better one "remove differentiation between PI and PA" or whatever. I think across the emails it has been clear. What I think is needed is to remove the fact that PI is assignment and PA is allocation and the "consequences of that". Both should be the same, regardless of fees, contract type, etc.
    
    > As I explained already, the intent is not to increase the end-user fees so they pay the same as an LIR, but to have some "proportionality" and to pay for the "real" NCC cost (which maybe still 50 euros, or maybe not, I don't know that, it is something that the NCC should calculate).
    
    I've read multiple times that costs are out of scope for the APWG. So without a change towards a per resource fee structure – which is out of scope here –, the proposed change forces PIv6 holders to either become a LIR at 1400,-- EUR/year or abandon their assignment.


[Jordi] Please read the other emails. Not an issue if that's the difficulty. The goal is that everything is "allocation". There are many possible ways to do that from the AGM perspective, and even if we don't decide that here, we must discuss it here because it provide "light" on the possible avenues.
    
    Regards,
    -kai
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.