[address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI

PI and PA are artificial names for the same thing. There is only one type of Global Unicast Addresses in IPv6.

As I already explained before, the same way the AGM created the end-user contract and the corresponding fee, they should be a new fee structure within the LIR contract, for those that have one of few /48s instead of /32 or /29, etc.

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Kai 'wusel' Siering <wusel+ml at uu.org>
Organización: Unseen University, Department of Magic Mails
Fecha: miércoles, 16 de mayo de 2018, 22:06
Para: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI

    Am 16.05.2018 um 14:52 schrieb JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg:
    
    > […]
    > I believe we have several problems that my proposal is trying to fix.
    > […]
    > Thoughts?
    
    To put it in a nutshell, I think you throw out the baby with bath water here: you're not simply "merging the requirements for PI and PA in a single policy", you'd take away any means for a non-LIR to request non-PA IP space. Moreover, you intend to force any current IPv6 PI holder into either becoming an LIR (which amounts to a 28fold cost increase: 50 => 1400 EUR/year) or to abandon the PIv6 space they build there infrastructure on. I don't yet understand what's your agenda, but I'm deeply concerned.
    
    Anyway: I oppose this proposal. It would cause a lot harm for no obvious reason.
    -kai
    
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.