This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kai 'wusel' Siering
wusel+ml at uu.org
Wed May 16 22:06:24 CEST 2018
Am 16.05.2018 um 14:52 schrieb JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg: > […] > I believe we have several problems that my proposal is trying to fix. > […] > Thoughts? To put it in a nutshell, I think you throw out the baby with bath water here: you're not simply "merging the requirements for PI and PA in a single policy", you'd take away any means for a non-LIR to request non-PA IP space. Moreover, you intend to force any current IPv6 PI holder into either becoming an LIR (which amounts to a 28fold cost increase: 50 => 1400 EUR/year) or to abandon the PIv6 space they build there infrastructure on. I don't yet understand what's your agenda, but I'm deeply concerned. Anyway: I oppose this proposal. It would cause a lot harm for no obvious reason. -kai
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] proposal to remove IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]