This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jan 16 12:31:19 CET 2018
> On 16 Jan 2018, at 11:19, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > My view is, in addition to that, if the contradictions are discovered during the PDP process, consensus can’t be declared until we can address them. Nope. If the WG decides that it's OK for a proposal to have a contradiction or be confusing then there's a consensus for that PoV. It would of course be bad if a WG reached that conclusion. But if that's what they decide, it shouldn't prevent a consensus declaration. If a WG makes stupid choices, that's initially the WG's problem. And maybe that state of affairs would encourage someone to present a new proposal which will correct those bad decisions. Policy proposals (and policies) don't have to be perfect. The just have to be good enough.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]