This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jan 16 12:22:05 CET 2018
> On 16 Jan 2018, at 11:11, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote: > > That's because I don't think that "rough consensus" is primarily about > how many supporters a proposal has, I think it's about primarily about > the nature and quality of the objection. Indeed. And how those objections were considered/addressed/resolved. > this can only be a discussion of principles and norms, it can never be turned into a rigid > set of rules. This model will always rest heavily on the judgment of the Chairs. I'm OK with that. Me too.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]