This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Tue Jan 16 11:54:23 CET 2018
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:40 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > 1) When you believe you agree with a policy proposal and declare it to the list (so chairs can measure consensus), do you “agree” only with the “policy text” or with the arguments written down in the policy proposal, or with the NCC interpretation (impact analysis), or all of them? Obviously, if I state only that I agree, I agree that the policy proposal as written is acceptable, and should be implemented, in light of whatever arguments and analysis have been made. > 2) What if the text in those 3 pieces are presenting contradictions or can be easily be interpreted in different ways? In that case, I have probably not seen the contradictions, or don't think that they are contradictions. -- Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what does consensus mean
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]