[address-policy-wg] Policy violation

On 18.12.2018 16:19, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
> As I got flagged by one active participant in this thread what I would
> mean by the below; whether it has been the NCC or the participant who I
> felt is attempting to intentionally misguiding the audience?
> 
> To be crystal clear: the latter of the two.

And to also make this very clear: I am, however, very delighted by my
observation that the vast majority of active participants here aren't
easily to be take for a ride by crude assertions and wannabe arguments.

This WG still works as designed, me thinks. :-)

> On 18.12.2018 13:16, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
>> Aleksey,
>>
>> your stream of argument:
>>
>> On 18.12.2018 11:30, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
>>> I think the NCC wants to have Monopoly for IP selling and doesn't want
>>> to devide profit with anyone.
>>>
>>> Of course it has more profit if there are more members with multiple
>>> accounts or many different accounts of different legal entities witch
>>> will pay for many years later.
>>
>> makes me sad.
>>
>> Very sad.
>>
>> As it is so...
>>
>> Ignorant?
>>
>> Fully intentionally misguiding?
>>
>> Deeply depressed:
>>
>> 	-C.