This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy violation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Tue Dec 18 16:19:33 CET 2018
As I got flagged by one active participant in this thread what I would mean by the below; whether it has been the NCC or the participant who I felt is attempting to intentionally misguiding the audience? To be crystal clear: the latter of the two. On 18.12.2018 13:16, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > Aleksey, > > your stream of argument: > > On 18.12.2018 11:30, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote: >> I think the NCC wants to have Monopoly for IP selling and doesn't want >> to devide profit with anyone. >> >> Of course it has more profit if there are more members with multiple >> accounts or many different accounts of different legal entities witch >> will pay for many years later. > > makes me sad. > > Very sad. > > As it is so... > > Ignorant? > > Fully intentionally misguiding? > > Deeply depressed: > > -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy violation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]