[address-policy-wg] 2018-03 Last Call for Comments (Fixing Outdated Information in the IPv4 Policy)

Gert,

while this was more of a cosmetic change and while this proposal did 
have support an no objections, I think that 4-5 e-mails of support 
should have at least required an extended discussion/review phase.

Especially since in last call nobody said a word.

my 2 cents.

Elvis


On 8/29/18 14:32, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 07:20:07AM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
>> But is there any reasons to comment something? We did it for 2015-01, but
>> you declared consensus.
> The mail where I declared consensus had a summary and detailed reasoning
> why decisions were made.  That certain people did not like 2015-01 because
> it broke their business model of requesting and quickly selling off /22s
> is understandable, but that was the whole point of the change - so yes,
> the community ignored those complaints.
>
> You know quite well that the WG chairs look very closely at the discussion
> and see if there is enough support to call it "rough consensus" or not
> (and either send the proposal back, or extent the discussion/review phase)
>
> Gert Doering
>          -- APWG chair