[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

Hi all,

I oppose this proposal.

1) If the actual routing table grows very quick, with all new lirs 
publishing /24 will make it over 1M routes in no-time, making mandatory 
to change "old" but very good routers that only can have 1M routes.
Yes, I know there are a lot of /24 (370k) but if we "force" to publish 
/24, as they dont have anything longer, will kill it.

2) As all we know, there are a VERY HUGE difference between pre-runout 
LIRS and post-runout LIRS in terms of address space and, if this 
proposal is approved the difference will become astronomic. The ones 
that a this moment have full /8's without use will have at least doubled 
the price of their IPs, making them more richs (in terms of address 
space/price per ip).

Again, instead of looking for a way to recover all the unused space from 
old LIRs or legacy we try to push more and more in the new ones.

Thats my two cents.

Regards,

-- Daniel