[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

Yes

I agree with your proposal

Regards,

On 22/09/2017 10:21, Carlos Friaças wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> <2017-03 co-author hat on>
> 
> "Access" is not the aim of this policy proposal.
> 
> Afaik, there was already a proposal which had some common points with
> what is described below, and it didn't get anywhere then.
> 
> Regards,
> Carlos Friaças
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017, noc at kwaoo.net wrote:
> 
>> Maybe the right path is to find some way to allocate those addresses to
>> real new entrants only
>>
>> Perhaps limitations like only one allocation:
>> - per LIR
>> - per legal entity
>> - per physical person
>> - per "network", "activity" or whatever, & based on how you should have
>> your own resources
>>
>> Anything that can allow the RIPE to say : "nope, you're obviously trying
>> to get more stuff from us, you got your part, we deny this allocation"
>>
>> This way, the last ressources' purpose will be filled properly, and not
>> scavenged by greedy guys
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> On 22/09/2017 09:04, Carlos Friaças wrote:
>>> This proposal is not aimed at preventing the complete runout. That will
>>> happen. This proposal aims to preserve some tiny resources for new
>>> entrants in this community, by trying to extend the time period until
>>> the runout occurs. We cannot "measure" its benefits until the runout
>>> occurs, and we can then count how many new entrants did get a tiny
>>> portion of (new, never used before) IPv4 address space.
>>
>> -- 
>> Jack
>> Net/sys admin
>>
>> More details about KWAOO can be found at:
>> https://as24904.kwaoo.net/
>>


-- 
Jack
Kwaoo noc

More details about KWAOO can be found at:
https://as24904.kwaoo.net/