[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

Hi,

<2017-03 co-author hat on>

"Access" is not the aim of this policy proposal.

Afaik, there was already a proposal which had some common points with 
what is described below, and it didn't get anywhere then.

Regards,
Carlos Friaças



On Fri, 22 Sep 2017, noc at kwaoo.net wrote:

> Maybe the right path is to find some way to allocate those addresses to
> real new entrants only
>
> Perhaps limitations like only one allocation:
> - per LIR
> - per legal entity
> - per physical person
> - per "network", "activity" or whatever, & based on how you should have
> your own resources
>
> Anything that can allow the RIPE to say : "nope, you're obviously trying
> to get more stuff from us, you got your part, we deny this allocation"
>
> This way, the last ressources' purpose will be filled properly, and not
> scavenged by greedy guys
>
> Regards,
>
> On 22/09/2017 09:04, Carlos Friaças wrote:
>> This proposal is not aimed at preventing the complete runout. That will
>> happen. This proposal aims to preserve some tiny resources for new
>> entrants in this community, by trying to extend the time period until
>> the runout occurs. We cannot "measure" its benefits until the runout
>> occurs, and we can then count how many new entrants did get a tiny
>> portion of (new, never used before) IPv4 address space.
>
> --
> Jack
> Net/sys admin
>
> More details about KWAOO can be found at:
> https://as24904.kwaoo.net/
>