[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

Hi,

I don't see a need to do this change in the policy at the moment.
consummation rate is the same as before.
Even if there is a need, it could be 3x/24 or /23.why change it from /22 to
/24?

Arash



On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Tim Chown <tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> > On 21 Sep 2017, at 13:33, Aled Morris <aled.w.morris at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 21 September 2017 at 12:43, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote:
> > The goal of this proposal is to reduce the IPv4 allocations made by the
> RIPE NCC
> > to a /24 (currently a /22) and only to LIRs that have not received an
> IPv4 allocation
> > directly from the RIPE NCC before.
> >
> > At the current run-rate, do we know what is the expected expiry of the
> free pool in RIPE's hands?
>
> There’s http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/.
>
> Tim
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170922/89f2e1b0/attachment.html>