[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)

> You're correct in saying that APWG does not deal with pricing, but
> it's a bit jesuitical not to acknowledge that the practical impact of
> this policy change will be a dramatic increase in RIR-allocated ipv4
> addresses.

someone wrote to me saying the same thing.  but they added that the
current situation has ripe selling a public good at radically below
market pricing and that this has resulted in some very asocial behavior
with bad long term effects.

>> but we can postpone the inevitable so folk have time to get in
>> the lifeboats.
> There is no amount of time that will be enough.

yes.  but v6 is slowly catching on, and we do what we can to make the
internet a better place.  there is no perfect.

randy