This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Thu Sep 21 17:01:35 CEST 2017
Randy Bush wrote: > did it say anything about price? i missed that? i did not think > the AP WG dealt with pricing; so it would be pretty strange. You're correct in saying that APWG does not deal with pricing, but it's a bit jesuitical not to acknowledge that the practical impact of this policy change will be a dramatic increase in RIR-allocated ipv4 addresses. > but we can postpone the inevitable so folk have time to get in > the lifeboats. There is no amount of time that will be enough. > so do we want to do it in a controlled and managed fashion or > chaotically? I genuinely don't think that this proposal will impact much on this either way. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03 New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]