[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Anno domini 2017 Marco Schmidt scripsit:

Hi Marco,

> Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification" is now in the Review Phase.

Cool, thanks for that!

> The goal of this proposal is to re-define the term "sub-assignment" for IPv6.
> 
> This proposal has been updated following the last round of discussion and is now at version v2.0.
> Some of the differences from version v1.0 include:
> - the scope is extended to all IPv6 assignments
> - it defines that the provision of separate IPv6 addresses is not considered a sub-assignment
> 
> The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest proposal version to support the community’s discussion. You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04
> 
> And the draft documents at:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04/draft

There seem's to be some glitch in the comparison between the proposal
versions. The diff seems to be in the wrong direction. Could you have
a look at that?

Thanks!

Best
Max
-- 
"I have to admit I've always suspected that MTBWTF would be a more useful
 metric of real-world performance."
 -- Valdis Kletnieks on NANOG