[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Dear colleagues,

Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification" is now in the Review Phase.

The goal of this proposal is to re-define the term "sub-assignment" for IPv6.

This proposal has been updated following the last round of discussion and is now at version v2.0.
Some of the differences from version v1.0 include:
- the scope is extended to all IPv6 assignments
- it defines that the provision of separate IPv6 addresses is not considered a sub-assignment

The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest proposal version to support the community’s discussion. You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04

And the draft documents at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04/draft

As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Review Phase is to continue discussing the proposal, taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document.

At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase.

We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 17 November 2017.

Kind regards,

Marco Schmidt
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC 

Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum