This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Mon Mar 27 10:44:00 CEST 2017
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017, at 03:32, Kai 'wusel' Siering wrote: > Sorry, but as a public ASN is to serve public inter-AS-uses, why even > think about private usage of a public resource? If you use a public AS > internally only, you should switch to a private AS. What do you call "public". There are a number of cases where inter- AS interconnection is required and still it's not visible to the outside world: - Virtual mobile operators (Full-MVNO) : you usually have to interconnect (IP-wise) with one or several "home radio networks", one or more "roaming brokers" and eventually with some other entities of the eco-system - "PPP Collect" : for operators that do not have an full national deployment, it is possible to purchase wholesale DSL links delivered "over L2TP over IP". In this case you have an e-BGP connection with the local-loop operator : you announce your LNS(-es) and RADIUS server(s) and tey announce thei LAC(s) and RADIUS proxy(es). Who we even have the same story for plain IPoE. - Some private cloud interconnections are not publically visible and do not follow the rules for "regular interconnections" (may accept private IP space and max prefix length may go up to /32 in v4) Some other cases exist as well. In all the above cases you have eBGP sessions that exchange prefixes that in IPv4 may go up to /32 ("PPP Collect" and "IPoE Collect" we receive and have to announce almost exclusively /32 - yes that's each v4 address individually announced). Useless to say that when you have several such interconnections using private ASNs things become a mess quite quickly. > > So, you need a "new" *external* routing policy to receive a > (public) ASN. If your ASN does not show up in the global routing > anymore, you obviously lost the need for that '"new" *external* > routing policy', no? > As explained above, all thoses cases involves routing policy "external" to the organisation using the AS using the "hidden" ASn. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170327/29d9558a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]