This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Mar 23 18:26:16 CET 2017
On 23/03/2017 14:18, Laurens Hoogendoorn wrote: > > Our Proposal > > We plan to email the LIR or sponsoring LIR for each unannounced ASN > and ask if the resource is still needed. We will group together ASNs > that are sponsored or held by the same LIR to minimise the number of > emails. > Very often, companies get bought or merge and then get bought out again. A company that received an ASN 15 years ago and hasn't updated their whois and isn't announcing the ASN will be difficult to track down. Might I suggest a further option: if you do not receive a response within 3 months, that you attempt to contact the national default contact. For example, I volunteer to be the national default contact for *.il. I am sure there are others that know all or most ASNs in their specific countries and would be willing to assist to track down the rightful owner if they still exist. Regards, Hank > > > We will ask if the ASN is currently being used or if there are plans > to start using the ASN in the coming three months. Organisations can > always request a new ASN in the future if they need one. > > If we do not receive a reply or if the ASN will not be used within > three months, we will start the process of returning the ASN to the > free pool. The deregistration process will take three months, during > which time the LIR can still indicate that the ASN is needed. If the > ASN is still needed, the validity of the assignment (such as the > multihoming requirement) will not be re-evaluated. > > We do not expect any significant cost or impact on other services, as > most of this process will be automated and we will not need to > re-evaluate the assignments. Contacting all relevant LIRs will take > less than six months. > > Please review this proposal and send any comments or other feedback > before Thursday 6 April to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>. > > Regards, > > Laurens Hoogendoorn > Registration Services > RIPE NCC > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170323/424b13d2/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cleaning up Unused AS Numbers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]