[address-policy-wg] 2015-04 Last Call for Comments (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 05:24:28PM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
> It would be great to allow transfers for blocks, received by means of merge
> and acquisition procedure of two or more different legal entities.
> 
> The reason is next: one company joins another one, but it doesn't need the
> blocks of the joined company.
> 
> Current policies disallow to transfer the blocks if the 24 month period
> didn't expire.
> 
> The NCC can mark such blocks as m&a, ma or other and allow to transfer them.
> 
> It will not cause new speculations due to there are different companies.

This would have to be addressed in a new policy proposal.


At this point in the PDP, no changes are possible anymore (the proposal
might be bounced back to review phase if *new* arguments opposing it 
show up, and then it could be changed - but the changes should be along
the original scope of the proposal)

See 

   https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-642

for a description of the phases of the PDP, and what can and can not
be done in Last Call ("Concluding Phase").

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170208/b97e6ac3/attachment.sig>