[address-policy-wg] Idea for aggregating IP addresses

Hello

The suggestion help IP broker to made bigger IP block and earn more 
money. bigger IP block is more expensive than smaller one. :)

Also why RIPE NCC should return "Spam dirty" IP range and assign new one 
to a user?

Thanks


On 9/22/2016 4:07 PM, Ping IP wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of the goals of RIPE is to aggregate IP addresses. I'd like to 
> suggest the ability for a LIR and End User to exchange number of 
> blocks of IP ranges for a greater block.
>
> For example:
> LIR/End User has 4 different /22 subnets and LIR/End User can exchange 
> these subnets for 1 x /20 subnet.
>
> This gives a LIR or End User the possibility to announce larger IP 
> subnets to the Internet. Helping the goal of aggregating the IP 
> addresses on the Internet.
>
> According one of the RIPE trainer, this is currently not possible 
> according the RIPE policy. Because there's no policy to give a LIR/End 
> User this ability.
>
> I'm curious to what you think of this idea.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Abdelouahed
> Ping IP network

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160922/57b67010/attachment.html>