<html style="direction: ltr;">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font face="Tahoma">Hello</font></p>
<p><font face="Tahoma">The suggestion help IP broker to made bigger
IP block and earn more money. bigger IP block is more expensive
than smaller one. :)</font></p>
<p><font face="Tahoma">Also why RIPE NCC should return "Spam dirty"
IP range and assign new one to a user?</font></p>
<p><font face="Tahoma">Thanks</font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/22/2016 4:07 PM, Ping IP wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAK6Ju8rLLYBdGVYXpqs7GfPkbUB2twe-30JYam4OZjD=oWxoqw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hello,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>One of the goals of RIPE is to aggregate IP addresses. I'd
like to suggest the ability for a LIR and End User to exchange
number of blocks of IP ranges for a greater block.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>For example:</div>
<div>LIR/End User has 4 different /22 subnets and LIR/End User
can exchange these subnets for 1 x /20 subnet.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This gives a LIR or End User the possibility to announce
larger IP subnets to the Internet. Helping the goal of
aggregating the IP addresses on the Internet.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>According one of the RIPE trainer, this is currently not
possible according the RIPE policy. Because there's no policy
to give a LIR/End User this ability.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I'm curious to what you think of this idea.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best regards,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Abdelouahed</div>
<div>Ping IP network</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>