This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
William Waites
ww at hubs.net.uk
Sat Oct 22 11:17:02 CEST 2016
> A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification" > is now available for discussion. I support this proposal as well. The current interpretation of the policy seems pathological to be honest. It could be supposed that given the Freifunk precedent, a local government (for example) would not be able to get a PI assignment because they provide complimentary Wifi in their lobby. I find it hard to believe that the original policy could have been intended to be read like this and indeed am a little surprised that the NCC has taken such an interpretation. So there is clearly a bug in the policy and this patch appears to fix it. Best wishes, -w -- William Waites Network Engineer HUBS AS60241
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]