[address-policy-wg] 2016-04 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification)

Hi list,

I support this proposal. It's seems logical and needed modify.
Simple and easy clarification to avoid misunderstading in 
interpretation. Well done thank you Max.

I realized that I was proposing sort of this to one of my customers just 
before summer season 2016 for beach side public wifi.
Project postponed to summer season 2017 for technical reasons.

I would copy the "Contractual requirements" under "New Policy Text" 
since like this seems to be part of the modify.

regards
Riccardo

Il 21/10/2016 10:15, Marco Schmidt ha scritto:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification"
> is now available for discussion.
>
> The goal of this proposal is to define sub-assignments in IPv6 PI assignments as subnets of /64 and shorter.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>      https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 21 November 2016.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
>
> Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
>

-- 
Riccardo Gori