[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

-1 for the proposal

If anything, better implement a policy which forces the (big players) to return their (huge amounts) of unused space, as 
briefly discussed a year ago:

https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2015-October/010768.html
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2015-October/010752.html

Just start by grabbing all ips currently listed on the marketplace and shut it down ;-)

BTW: How much money was and is invested in building and maintaining the marketplace?

Corin

On 20.10.2016 12:07, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Richard Hartmann
> <richih.mailinglist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I support this proposal.
>
> To qualify my +1, while I do get the argument that this will not
> entirely stop hogging and speculation, it's at least a step in the
> right direction.
>
> Even considering Ricardo's emails, I don't see a hard argument against
> this proposal as it's easily possible to set up the downstream LIR
> earlier if they anticipate the need, anyway.
>
>
> To me, the pros outweigh the possible cons, and it's an overall improvement.
>
>
> Richard
>