This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Thu Oct 20 12:07:53 CEST 2016
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist at gmail.com> wrote: > I support this proposal. To qualify my +1, while I do get the argument that this will not entirely stop hogging and speculation, it's at least a step in the right direction. Even considering Ricardo's emails, I don't see a hard argument against this proposal as it's easily possible to set up the downstream LIR earlier if they anticipate the need, anyway. To me, the pros outweigh the possible cons, and it's an overall improvement. Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]