[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Guess it's a last resort when they see that they are running out of
> arguments? And amazing that
> some people have turned to "personal" attacks here rather than
> discussing the policy at hand.
>
>
> Either way - well handled Gert, you got my full support.
>

I agree completely, thanks for voicing it that way.

Regarding the policy at hand, even considering Nick Hillard's argument
> it's hard to not support
> this policy. It at least try to solve a almost impossible problem to
> solve, better to do some
> than nothing? So a clear support from me.
>

I support the proposal.

The current text appears sufficiently improved to address the concerns
raised, as I see it.

-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20161019/f14a71b8/attachment.html>